Who must resolve the Global Warming The Goverments or the Private Initiative?
Based in what is correct, this problem should never had happen.
Based in the reality and how things work, we are going to analyze which is the best decision to control global warming.
Fact: The goverments are to help in the activities of their inhabitants without interfering them.
To interfere in the investments, projects and jobs of the Oil Companies means to interfere in their activities instead of helping them.
Fact: The Global Warming activists explains the urgency of fast and effective changes and expect the goverments to do that.
In the reality the goverments don't want to do, several decades had demonstrated that it is senseless to insist and the Global Warming activists can create fast and effective changes with the advancement of technology.
For some people an analogy can help: the sugar is killing people and kids, and this is serious, creating problems indirectly like the social security expenses in the health of the population.
Expect the goverment to solve the situation can be like the prohibition of alcohol 1920-1933, they will affect investments in sowing, industries like sweetmeats, chocolate, etc.
What is happening? Slowly but steadily new social values of healthy food had been consolidating, to take water without sugar, to eat smaller portions, and the industry is adjusting to this new social values of healthy foods.
The same is happening with global warming, the society is adjusting to a cleaner society, the problem is the time, we need faster and effective measures.
The question is now: How can we take faster and effective measures to control global warming?
We need to speed up the normal process of social change that is happening.
To spped up the normal process of social change, we need to organize what we must change, and organize the change globally.
In example, instead of asking to turn off light for one hour each year, we can ask to change bulbs to led, and give one year to execute this change.
We need a project and a group of people who organize that plans.
We need plans that doesn't requires permanent attention, like turning off light each time you leave a room.
You can install a control of pressure of water in your house and avoid wasting water each time you open the water tap.
If we are going to create global plans, we need to gather experts and creates the best plans we can, and create plans specific to each different area of the world when is necessary.
The idea is simple to control the global warming, a project that manages plans, a group of experts that creates them and agroupations that execute them locally.
Based in the reality and how things work, we are going to analyze which is the best decision to control global warming.
Fact: The goverments are to help in the activities of their inhabitants without interfering them.
To interfere in the investments, projects and jobs of the Oil Companies means to interfere in their activities instead of helping them.
Fact: The Global Warming activists explains the urgency of fast and effective changes and expect the goverments to do that.
In the reality the goverments don't want to do, several decades had demonstrated that it is senseless to insist and the Global Warming activists can create fast and effective changes with the advancement of technology.
For some people an analogy can help: the sugar is killing people and kids, and this is serious, creating problems indirectly like the social security expenses in the health of the population.
Expect the goverment to solve the situation can be like the prohibition of alcohol 1920-1933, they will affect investments in sowing, industries like sweetmeats, chocolate, etc.
What is happening? Slowly but steadily new social values of healthy food had been consolidating, to take water without sugar, to eat smaller portions, and the industry is adjusting to this new social values of healthy foods.
The same is happening with global warming, the society is adjusting to a cleaner society, the problem is the time, we need faster and effective measures.
The question is now: How can we take faster and effective measures to control global warming?
We need to speed up the normal process of social change that is happening.
To spped up the normal process of social change, we need to organize what we must change, and organize the change globally.
In example, instead of asking to turn off light for one hour each year, we can ask to change bulbs to led, and give one year to execute this change.
We need a project and a group of people who organize that plans.
We need plans that doesn't requires permanent attention, like turning off light each time you leave a room.
You can install a control of pressure of water in your house and avoid wasting water each time you open the water tap.
If we are going to create global plans, we need to gather experts and creates the best plans we can, and create plans specific to each different area of the world when is necessary.
The idea is simple to control the global warming, a project that manages plans, a group of experts that creates them and agroupations that execute them locally.
Comments
Post a Comment